FDA votes against Pfizer booster shot for general public

A U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) advisory panel voted unanimously Friday to recommend Pfizer (PFE)/BioNTech’s (BNTX) third dose for Americans 65 and older, and for those with high risk of contracting a severe case of COVID-19. The vote authorizing a booster for 65 and older was the panel’s second decision of the afternoon, following a ruling against booster doses for Americans 16 and over. The second vote also approved emergency use authorization rather than a supplemental approval of the already fully-licensed vaccine. A CDC advisory panel meeting, slated for next week, will delve further into who will qualify for the additional dose. Dr. Lena Wen, visiting professor at George Washington University Milken Institute School of Public Health, told Yahoo Finance the vote achieved a balance. The vote comes after a heated debate in recent weeks over the need for booster or additional shots, which both mRNA companies — Pfizer and Moderna (MRNA) — have advocated for. “This is a reasonable ‘middle ground’ solution and gives discretion to physicians and patients to decide who is high risk. That level of individual decision-making is key,” Wen said. “Of course, it’s true that the unvaccinated are the major problem when it comes to spread of covid, but it shouldn’t mean that those vaccinated don’t deserve to be better protected with an extra dose if they so choose,” Wen added. Dr. Peter Marks, the FDA’s leading expert on vaccines, touched on the recent controversy in his introductory remarks. “We know that there may be differing opinions of the interpretation of the data regarding the potential need for additional doses, and we strongly encourage all the different viewpoints to be voiced and discussed regarding the data, which is complex, and evolving,” Marks said. He added the meeting focused on almost real-time analyses compared to what is happening in the world, and the goal remains slowing the spread of COVID-19, which is killing almost 2,000 Americans daily. The question the advisory panel was originally given to consider only used the U.S. data, a small dataset, despite the presentations including data from the U.K. and Israel. Marks instructed the panel to consider all the data, noting, “This is not a legal proceeding, this is a science proceeding, so you can take all the data into account.” The meeting precedes a September 20 start date for additional doses, announced last month by the White House COVID-19 Response Team, despite U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data showing some Americans are already receiving third doses. Last month, the CDC recommended additional doses for immunocompromised people. A CDC advisory panel will meet next week to discuss recommendations for who should receive a booster dose. At a Response Team briefing Friday, U.S. Surgeon General Dr. Vivek Murthy said the administration is already communicating with pharmacies, nursing homes and state officials to help roll out additional doses. But whether or not the average American also needed boosters had been a growing debate for weeks. Measuring antibody levels after a vaccine, which tend to wane, versus relying on memory cells, which can recall how to fight the virus, as is typical in vaccinations, was at the heart of the debate in the science community. A Pfizer official acknowledged that “its a much more complex story” than just antibody titers — even as the company relied on that data to advocate for additional doses. Meanwhile, some who opposed third doses believed those doses could be better used in countries with low vaccination rates. Marks also addressed that at the start of the meeting Friday, noting that the committee is only supposed to weigh on the data and need for shots, and not on global vaccine equity or operational concerns in rolling out a booster campaign in the U.S. The decision Friday heavily leaned on data from Israel, as well as the U.K., which has been a point of concern. In days prior, both mRNA vaccine companies discussed and advocated for boosters. A new report from the CDC Friday showed that Moderna’s vaccine remained stronger in protecting against hospitalization compared to Pfizer and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Both mRNA company CEOs have previously told Yahoo Finance that additional doses are inevitable. But when those doses will be needed — annually or sometime after a third shot — remains unknown. Moderna president Stephen Hoge said as much in a recent interview. “We don’t really know” if a third shot will be the final or if more are needed, he said. Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla penned an open letter advocating for boosters based on the company’s clinical trial data and data from Israel. But the FDA previously cautioned that some studies from Israel, including a few published this week, have not been independently verified by the regulatory agency. Bourla also addressed the concerns about equitable distribution of vaccines globally. “I believe …that the introduction of booster doses should not change the number of doses that each country receives. No commitments already made by Pfizer to a country will change if boosters are approved,” Bourla said. Meanwhile, the U.S. is reportedly gearing up to buy an additional 500 million doses of the Pfizer vaccine for global donations, according to the Washington Post.

Delta variant warning: Lockdown ‘may still be required’ despite heroic vaccine rollout

SCIENTISTS have raised new concerns about the rapid spread of the Delta variant of coronavirus, warning new restrictions “may still be required” even after a successful vaccine rollout. The Covid warning comes after the Government did not rule out a “firebreak” in response to rising infections and hospitalisations with COVID-19, but only as “a last resort” measure. The Delta variant was first reported in India last year and has quickly proven to be more easily transmissible and resistant to Covid antibodies. The SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 variant has since spread to more than 90 countries and has emerged as the leading cause of infections in the UK, US and Israel, among others.

SCIENTISTS have raised new concerns about the rapid spread of the Delta variant of coronavirus, warning new restrictions “may still be required” The Covid warning comes after the Government did not rule out a “firebreak” lockdown in response to rising infections and hospitalisations with COVID-19, but only as “a last resort” measure. The Delta variant was first reported in India last year and has quickly proven to be more easily transmissible and resistant to Covid antibodies. The SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617.2 variant has since spread to more than 90 countries and has emerged as the leading cause of infections in the UK, US and Israel, among others.Spikes in the number of infected are being reported despite an increasing number of people being vaccinated against Covid. In the UK, more than 48.2 million people have received their first dose of the Covid vaccine and more than 43.5 people have had their second jab. Globally, World Health Organization (WHO) data indicates more than 5.35 billion jabs have already been administered. According to a new paper published in the journal Nature, Delta’s dominance may be due to its “increased infectivity and reduced sensitivity to neutralising antibodies”. The study, carried out by Ravindra Gupta of the Cambridge Institute of Therapeutic Immunology and Infectious Disease and colleagues, compared the Delta variant’s genetic mutations against the original strain of SARS-CoV-2. In a laboratory environment, the mutated variant was found to be six-fold less sensitive to antibodies found in individuals who have recovered from COVID-19.

Even more worryingly, the variant was found to be eight-fold less sensitive to the antibodies produced by the Pfizer–BioNTech and AstraZeneca vaccines.

A press release issued by Springer Nature states: “The research suggests that continued infection control measures may still be required in the post-vaccination era.” The study’s authors tested the Delta variant on lab models of the human airway to see how it replicates. Delta was found more effective at replicating than the Alpha variant, also known as the Kent variant. The scientists believe the advantage is the result of the “predominantly cleaved configuration” of the virus’s spike protein. Spike proteins are tiny structures all over the virus’s body that allow the coronavirus to enter human cells to replicate. In the case of Delta, the spike protein allows the virus to replicate at much faster rates than the Kappa variant. The study was carried out over a six-week period between March and April this year. The scientists studied the infections of 130 healthcare workers from three hospitals in Delhi who have received two doses of the AstraZeneca jab. The vaccine was found to be less effective against the Delta variant in these patients, compared to other strains. The authors warned in their paper: “Compromised vaccine efficacy against the highly fit and immune evasive B.1.617.2 Delta variant warrants continued infection control measures in the post-vaccination era.” Scientists have been sounding the alarm on the Delta variant, following worrying reports about the long-term efficacy of Covid vaccines.Data published in Israel, for instance, suggests protection against the virus effectively “vanishes” about six months after being jabbed. However, vaccines are still seen as the quickest way out of the pandemic and there are no plans in place for another lockdown here in the UK. It was reported this week the Government has been considering a brief lockdown during October’s half-term school holiday. An official spokesman for the Prime Minister has since confirmed this is not the case but the Government has not entirely ruled out a firebreak lockdown either.He said: “We have retained contingency plans as part of responsible planning for a range of scenarios, but these kind of measures would only be reintroduced as a last resort to prevent unsustainable pressure on our NHS. “I think we’ve been clear throughout that we will take action, and indeed we have done when necessary to protect our NHS.” According to a report in the i newspaper, an anonymous insider within the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (Sage) has said plans had been drawn up as a result of a recent spike in hospitalisations. The source said: “It would be sensible to have contingency plans, and if a lockdown is required, to time it so that it has minimal economic and societal impact. “We are going to be at a peak, albeit an extended peak, quite soon, so it’s not really the same situation as last year, when failure to reduce prevalence would have resulted in collapse of the NHS and people dying in car parks. “Hospitals might be overflowing before deaths reach the same level. Acting early will prevent this level.”

Buy Home test kits here results for your eyes only…

Be Smart!

Biden: COVID, supply chain issues contribute to economic challenges

United States President Joe Biden stated during his speech on Thursday that the COVID-19 pandemic, supply chain issues, as well as bad actors seeking to profit off of the crisis, contribute to the country’s economic challenges. Biden pointed out that is why his top priority has been taking the coronavirus issue under control and therefore he introduced vaccination mandates. The president criticized governors of Florida and Texas for undermining the COVID-19 vaccine requirements and calling his move “tyrannical”. The American leader also blamed corporations and “bad actors” for increasing gas prices, when there’s lots of economic evidence that says the prices should in fact be going down.

Mandatory COVID passes in Italy from October 15

Italy is set to become the first European country to make a COVID-19 “Green Pass” mandatory for all workers. It is a digital or paper certificate showing someone has received at least one vaccine dose, tested negative or recently recovered from the disease. Officials told Reuters that the decree was expected to come into force on October 15 for both public and private sector workers. Any worker who fails to present a valid pass will be suspended on no pay, but cannot be sacked. “The green pass is an important tool to deal with this serious situation. In such a serious situation we need effective solutions.” “In my opinion it is not fair, because if I am a free citizen, I can decide whether or not to get a green pass. When there is an obligation, we no longer live in a democracy, but in a dictatorship. So I do not agree.” There have been sporadic protests in recent weeks against the growing pressure to get a jab. But most political parties in the country have backed mandatory COVID passes, hoping it will prevent further economic lockdowns. While the employers’ federation also welcomed the move, unions have been lukewarm and are demanding that tests should be given freely to those who refuse to be vaccinated. Officials have pushed back on this, saying it would encourage people to keep on shunning vaccines. Around 74% of Italy’s population have had at least one COVID-19 shot and 68% are fully vaccinated.

COVID-19 booster vaccine campaign begins in England… France suspends 3,000 health staff as Europe targets vaccine refusal

LONDON (Reuters) – England launched its COVID-19 booster vaccination campaign on Thursday, the National Health Service (NHS) said, after officials and the government gave the go-ahead for the programme earlier in the week. British Prime Minister Boris Johnson on Tuesday outlined how the booster programme for over-50s and other priority groups will form a key plank of his plan to navigate the winter without further coronavirus lockdowns. Booster vaccinations will be given at least six months after people received their second dose of COVID-19 vaccine, meaning the rollout will roughly follow the original priority list, and start with the oldest, most vulnerable and health workers. NHS England said that hospital hubs had started vaccinating health workers, with full rollout to the community set to begin next week. “It is brilliant to see that the first booster jabs are being rolled out today,” health minister Sajid Javid said. “I urge everyone who is eligible to come forward for their booster when invited, to prolong the protection that the vaccine offers those most at risk as we approach the winter months.” Britain’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) recommended that Pfizer/BioNTech’s shot be used in the booster campaign, or alternatively a half-dose of Moderna’s vaccine. The government also decided this week to move ahead with mass vaccination of children aged 12-15, which the NHS said would begin in schools next week.

France suspends 3,000 health staff as Europe targets vaccine refusal

PARIS (Reuters) – Hospitals, care homes and health centres have suspended around 3,000 workers across France for failing to comply with mandatory COVID vaccination, the government said on Thursday, as countries around Europe weigh how far to go to combat the pandemic https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/european-nations-plans-coping-with-covid-19-2021-09-15. While Italy is set to announce later on Thursday that proof of vaccination or a negative test will be compulsory for all workers, going further than any other country in the region, the Netherlands plans a similar step – but only to go to bars or clubs https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/dutch-expected-ease-covid-19-measures-introduce-corona-pass-2021-09-14. Britain, meanwhile, says it is highly likely to require front-line health and social care workers in England to be vaccinated as part of a plan https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/uk-likely-require-health-workers-be-vaccinated-against-covid-2021-09-14 to contain the virus during winter. In France, President Emmanuel Macron’s decision in mid-July to require a similar health pass to go anywhere from restaurants to gyms and museums, and make the jab mandatory for health workers, has massively increased vaccination take-up. With the mandate for workers in hospitals and care homes taking effect on Wednesday, its very concrete impact – unvaccinated staff forbidden to work – started to be felt https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/french-hospital-worker-im-hunger-strike-over-vaccine-mandate-2021-09-16. According to local daily Nice Matin, nearly 450 health workers – out of 7,500 – have been suspended in just one hospital in the city of Nice, in southern France. The government, however, shrugged off the impact. “It hasn’t been chaos, far from it,” Health Minister Olivier Veran told French RTL radio, adding there were 27 million workers in the sector. There have been a few cases where it has affected care, he said, like the use of an MRI being briefly complicated, but most suspended staff work in support roles, limiting the impact. “Most of the suspensions are only temporary … many have decided to get vaccinated as they see that the vaccination mandate is a reality,” Veran said. But unions warn of likely disruptions to care, and just a few absentees in a team is enough to trigger a crisis, Emmanuel Chignon, a care home manager in Bordeaux told Reuters this week, pointing to how hard it was to hire staff https://www.reuters.com/business/healthcare-pharmaceuticals/french-care-home-some-staff-quit-over-vaccine-mandate-2021-09-15 in the sector. “If we can’t replace the carers who leave, the work will fall on the others, and I fear an unvirtuous circle, with tiredness, exhaustion and an increase in absenteeism,” he said. In Italy, where vaccination for health workers was made mandatory at the end of March, some have been suspended, but with numbers nowhere near those seen in France. As of Sept. 16, some 728 doctors in all of Italy had been suspended for failing to be vaccinated, the Italian doctors’ federation said. Italy is now set to go much further and announce on Thursday that a “Green pass” – showing someone has received at least one vaccine dose, tested negative or recently recovered from the virus – will be mandatory for all public and private sector workers. Failure to have a Green Pass will result in workers being suspended and losing their pay. In other countries, like the Netherlands, opinion polls show a majority of the public favouring mandatory vaccination for health workers, with the workers themselves mostly opposed to it, and the government has said it will not take such measures. However a pass showing proof of vaccination or a recent negative coronavirus test is set to be required there as of Sept 25 to go to bars, restaurants, clubs or cultural events. Although polls have shown that a majority of the Dutch support the measure, the pass is strongly opposed by the around 30% of the population who have so far refused to be vaccinated. Critics say the measure is meant to force people to get the jab.

China fully vaccinates 1 billion people – NHC

Beijing, China — China has fully vaccinated more than one billion people against the coronavirus — 71 percent of its population — official figures showed Thursday. The country had mostly curbed the virus within its borders but is racing to get the vast majority of its population vaccinated as a new outbreak takes hold in the southeast. “As of September 15, 2.16 billion vaccine doses have been administered nationwide,” said National Health Commission spokesman Mi Feng at a press briefing. Chinese health authorities said late last month that 890 million people in China had been fully vaccinated and two billion doses administered. The government has not publicly announced a target for vaccination coverage, but top virologist Zhong Nanshan said last month that the country is likely to have 80 percent of its population inoculated by the end of the year. China is currently battling an outbreak of the Delta variant in the southeastern province of Fujian that has infected almost 200 people so far in three cities, many of whom are schoolchildren. The Fujian cluster is the biggest rebound in weeks and comes after the country declared the Delta variant under control, in a test of China’s “zero-case” approach to the pandemic. China reported 80 new cases on Thursday, of which 49 were domestic transmissions.

White House plans ‘new system’ for international travel

WASHINGTON — White House coronavirus response coordinator Jeff Zients said Wednesday the United States is a developing a “new system for international travel” that will include new strong mitigation procedures like contact tracing. the administration does not plan to immediately relax any travel restrictions because of COVID-19 Delta variant cases. “We are exploring considering vaccination requirements for foreign nationals traveling to the United States,” Zients said. Coronavirus response coordinator Jeff Zients said Wednesday the United States is a developing a “new system for international travel” that will include new strong mitigation procedures like contact tracing. Zients told the U.S. Travel and Tourism Advisory Board Wednesday the administration does not plan to immediately relax any travel restrictions because of COVID-19 Delta variant cases. “We are exploring considering vaccination requirements for foreign nationals traveling to the United States,” Zients said. he idea was shelved, but top White House officials say that proposal and similar ones are still under consideration – including, potentially, a broader vaccine mandate that would include domestic air travel. “We’re discussing it,” Anthony Fauci, President Joe Biden’s chief medical adviser, said about the idea of a broader requirement in an interview. “It’s on the table for discussion.”

Third Pfizer shot boosts immunity to 95%

A third dose of the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine could offer strong protection against the Indian ‘Delta’ variant, data reveals, as a separate study finds protection provided by the vaccine could wane after six months. New data released by the company on Wednesday showed antibody levels increased five-fold among people ages 18 to 55 who were given the booster shot. The third dose was especially effecting for the elderly, with antibody levels spiking 11-fold among people aged 65 to 85 who had already received the standard two doses. In the slides published online, the researchers wrote there there is ‘estimated potential for up to 100-fold increase in Delta neutralization post-dose three compared to pre-dose three.’

Data from Pfizer shows that the third dose of the company's COVID vaccine can increase antibodies to fight the Delta variant 11-fold in people 65 to 85

 

Data from Pfizer shows that the third dose of the company’s COVID vaccine can increase antibodies to fight the Delta variant 11-fold in people 65 to 85 The Delta variant continues to spread across the country, making up at least 83 percent of all new infections. Pfizer produces the most commonly used vaccine in the U.S., having been administered over 190 million times, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Early adopters of the vaccine may soon has their immunity to the virus slightly diminished. Research, which has not been peer-reviewed, led by Pfizer and Syracuse University in New York finds that the vaccine was 91 percent effective in preventing the virus for six months. It continues to drop at that rate, researchers say, the vaccine could drop below 50 percent efficacy 18 months after administration. Those who received the vaccine first may have already had its efficacy drop, meaning a third dose could be required soon.

China (DNA Modified) gain-of-function research Funded by Fauci and the NIH… proof

Stalin said “When we hang the capitalists they will sell us the rope we use.” In this case we gave them the money for the rope

The Wuhan Institute of Virology and the nearby Wuhan University Center for Animal Experiment, along with their collaborator, the U.S.-based nonprofit EcoHealth Alliance, have engaged in what the U.S. government defines as “gain-of-function research of concern,” (Genetic Modification) intentionally making viruses more pathogenic or transmissible in order to study them. Grant money for the controversial experiment came from the National Institutes of Health’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which is headed by Anthony Fauci. The award to EcoHealth Alliance, a research organization which studies the spread of viruses from animals to humans, included subawards to Wuhan Institute of Virology and East China Normal University. The principal investigator on the grant is EcoHealth Alliance President Peter Daszak, who has been a key voice in the search for Covid-19’s origins.

Several scientists said the NIH recently released documents points to biosafety concerns, highlighting a general lack of oversight for research on pathogens and raising questions about what other information has not been publicly disclosed.

“As a virologist, I personally think creating chimeras of SARS-related bat coronaviruses that are thought to pose high risk to humans entails unacceptable risks,” said Jesse Bloom, who studies the evolution of viruses at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center. Severe acute respiratory syndrome, or SARS, is a disease caused, like Covid-19, by an airborne coronavirus.

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Anthony Fauci listens during a briefing on the coronavirus pandemic at the White House on March 26, 2020 in Washington, DC.

National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Anthony Fauci listens during a briefing on the coronavirus pandemic at the White House on March 26, 2020, in Washington, D.C.

The experiment also raises questions about assertions from Fauci and NIH Director Francis Collins that NIH-funded projects at the Wuhan Institute of Virology did not involve gain-of-function research. In May, Fauci testified before Congress: “The NIH has not ever and does not now fund gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology.”
Scientists working under a 2014 NIH grant to the EcoHealth Alliance to study bat coronaviruses combined the genetic material from a “parent” coronavirus known as WIV1 with other viruses.
They twice submitted summaries of their work that showed that, when in the lungs of genetically engineered mice, three altered bat coronaviruses at times reproduced far more quickly than the original virus on which they were based. The altered viruses were also somewhat more pathogenic, with one causing the mice to lose significant weight.

The researchers reported, “These results demonstrate varying pathogenicity of SARSr-CoVs with different spike proteins in humanized mice.”But the terms of the grant clearly stipulated that the funding could not be used for gain-of-function experiments. The grant conditions also required the researchers to immediately report potentially dangerous results and stop their experiments pending further NIH review.

According to both the EcoHealth Alliance and NIH, the results were reported to the agency, but NIH determined that rules designed to restrict gain-of-function research did not apply.

Seven consulted scientists who are virologists or work in adjacent fields and hold a range of views on both the ethics of gain-of-function research and the Covid-19 origins search. said that the work appears to meet NIH’s criteria for gain-of-function research. Three experts said that, while they did not have enough knowledge of U.S. policies to comment on whether the research met NIH criteria, the experiment involving humanized mice was unnecessarily risky. One virologist, Vincent Racaniello, a professor of microbiology and immunology at Columbia University, said while he considered the mouse experiment described in the document to clearly fall into the gain-of-function category.

NIH grant for research titled:

Understanding-Risk-Bat-Coronavirus-Emergence-Grant-Notice link below 528 pages

But the group’s bat coronavirus research was focused on the very threat that bat viruses pose to people. Kessler did acknowledge that, while the original bat coronavirus in the experiment did not spread among humans, the research was designed to gauge how bat coronaviruses could evolve to infect humans. Scientists consulted agreed that, whatever title it is given, the newly public experiment raised serious concerns about the safety and oversight of federally funded research. “In my point of view, the debate about the definition of ‘gain-of-function’ has been too much focused on technical aspects,” said Jacques van Helden, a professor of bioinformatics at Aix-Marseille Université. “The real question is whether or not research has the potential to create or facilitate the selection of viruses that might infect humans.” The experiments described in the proposal clearly do have that potential, he said.

NIH spokesperson Elizabeth Deatrick said that the agency had considered the research — and decided not to restrict it under its own rules. “In 2016, NIAID determined that the work was not subject to the Gain-of-Function (GoF) research funding pause and the subsequent HHS P3CO Framework,” Deatrick wrote, referring to criteria put in place in 2017 to guide the agency’s funding decisions about research that involves, or is reasonably anticipated to involve, potential pandemic pathogens.

Paul accused Fauci of lying when he claimed that NIH did not fund gain-of-function research at the Wuhan Institute of Virology. Experts now say that the documents support the contention that NIH funded gain-of-function work, “There’s no question,” said Racaniello, of Columbia University, who pointed to the decreased weight of the mice infected with the chimeric viruses that was described in the research summaries sent to NIH. “From the weight loss, it’s gain of function. Tony Fauci is wrong saying it’s not.”

The humanized mouse experiment fits with the overall goal of the $3.1 million grant, which was titled “Understanding the Risk of Bat Coronavirus Emergence” and aimed at preventing a pandemic by predicting the circumstances under which a bat coronavirus could evolve to infect humans. The researchers took an ambitious three-pronged approach: screening people with high exposure to wildlife, mathematical modeling, and lab experiments on viruses. Peter Daszak, the EcoHealth Alliance president, has worked closely with scientists in China for years, and roughly $750,000 of the grant was allocated for the Wuhan Institute of Virology. An additional nearly $300,000 went to East China Normal University, where researchers did field sampling.

In a 2005 paper, Daszak’s team showed that the first SARS virus originated in bats. Middle East respiratory syndrome, or MERS, is caused by a coronavirus that emerged in 2012 and also believed to come from bats, which are now a prime target for virologists trying to understand and combat emerging diseases. Daszak has long maintained that his research is critical to preventing outbreaks.

The research on the bat viruses in Wuhan showed that infecting live animals with altered viruses can have unpredictable consequences. A report to NIH on the project’s progress in the year ending in May 2018 described scientists creating new coronaviruses by changing parts of WIV1 and exposing genetically engineered mice to the new chimeric viruses.

Research published in 2017 in the journal PLOS Pathogen showed that, in cells in a laboratory, similar chimeric viruses reproduced less effectively than the original. NIH cited that research as one of the reasons the moratorium on gain-of-function research of concern didn’t apply to this experiment. “It was a loss of function, not a gain of function,” the email from NIH explained.

(NIH also pointed out that the changes to the chimeric viruses “would not be anticipated to increase virulence or transmissibility in humans.”) Nick Bit: They sure as shit got that one wrong!!

Inside the lungs of the humanized mice, however, the novel viruses appear to have reproduced far more quickly than the original virus that was used to create them, according to a bar graph shown in the documents. The viral load in the lung tissue of the mice was, at certain points, up to 10,000 times higher in the mice infected with the altered viruses than in those infected with WIV1.

over to humans and cause widespread disease.”

Scientists reviewing research said the jump in viral load indicated that the modified RNA virus could replicate far more rapidly than the original in the lungs of the mice, likely leading to increased pathogenicity and spread. Another figure in the documents suggests that at least one of the altered viruses not only enhanced viral reproduction, but also caused the humanized mice to lose more weight than those exposed to the original virus — a measure of the severity of illness.

table-1

A graph from a report on NIH-funded research in Wuhan shows viral load in lung tissues of humanized mice.

The enhanced growth of the chimeric coronaviruses in the humanized mice was, at one point, up to 4 log greater — or 10,000 times — the rate of the original virus. But there are no indications the research was stopped.In fact, the bat coronavirus grant was renewed for a five-year period in 2019, although the Trump administration suspended funding in April 2020 amid the Covid-19 pandemic and spiraling concerns about its origins.
The practice of making chimeric viruses in order to study how they might become more contagious was under scrutiny long before the pandemic. Proponents of such gain-of-function research argued that it can help virologists better understand and defend against natural outbreaks. But critics said that they were unreasonably dangerous. Stuart Newman, a professor of cell biology who directs the developmental biology laboratory at New York Medical College. “Making chimeric coronaviruses, mixing and matching RBDs [a part of the virus that allows it to attach to receptors] and spike proteins is exactly the scenario imagined by many lab-leak scenario proponents,” said Newman. “The fact that this was an established research paradigm in the Wuhan lab … definitely makes the laboratory origin more plausible.”

“The contents of the grants raise serious questions about the review processes and oversight relating to risky pathogen research,” said Alina Chan, a Boston-based scientist. Nick Note: Of course the Covid19 virus was enhanced if not created at the Wuhan lab, See for yourself, NIH funding document below…

Proof NIH funded Wuhan Covid19 Experiments

U.S. Army says soldiers who refuse COVID-19 vaccine could be dismissed

Sep 15 (Reuters) – American army officers who refuse to be vaccinated against the coronavirus could be suspended from their duties and possibly discharged, the U.S. Army said on Tuesday. a group of people in uniform walking on a street: FILE PHOTO: July 4th events are held in Bristol, Rhode Island © Reuters/QUINN GLABICKI FILE PHOTO: July 4th events are held in Bristol, Rhode Island After the Food and Drug Administration fully approved the Pfizer/BioNTech vaccine in August, Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin had ordered https://media.defense.gov/2021/Aug/25/2002838826/-1/-1/0/MEMORANDUM-FOR-MANDATORY-CORONAVIRUS-DISEASE-2019-VACCINATION-OF-DEPARTMENT-OF-DEFENSE-SERVICE-MEMBERS.PDF that all active duty service members must get vaccinated.

The Army said it had begun implementing this order in late August, adding that soldiers could request an exemption on legitimate medical, religious or administrative grounds. However, commanders, command sergeants major, first sergeants and officers in Command Select List positions who refuse to be vaccinated and are not pending an exemption request would face suspension and relief if they refuse to comply, the Army said in a statement. “While soldiers who refuse the vaccine will first be counseled by their chain of command and medical providers, continued failure to comply could result in administrative or non-judicial punishment – to include relief of duties or discharge,” it said. “This is quite literally a matter of life and death for our soldiers, their families and the communities in which we live,” U.S. Army Surgeon General Raymond Scott Dingle said, citing concern over the spread of the highly contagious Delta variant. As of last week, the U.S. Department of Defense had reported https://www.defense.gov/Explore/Spotlight/Coronavirus-DOD-Response over 353,000 COVID-19 cases across its personnel and more than 450 deaths. The Army now expects its active duty units to be fully vaccinated by Dec. 15, and its Reserve and National Guard units by June 30 of next year.